Skip to content

Chad

My feedback

4 results found

  1. 23 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Chad supported this idea  · 
  2. 93 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Chad supported this idea  · 
  3. 97 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Chad supported this idea  · 
  4. 31 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Chad supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Chad commented  · 

    Currently for contacts in Rex, the two address entries under Location share the same merge field - if both have something entered, the postal address takes priority and is used for the merge.

    We'd find if useful if these were two separate merge fields - for example, so a letter could reference an address that may not necessarily be a property attached to the contact's record, or a non-specific address, such as only a suburb.

Feedback and Knowledge Base